Lessons on Avoiding the Hidden Pitfalls of Enterprise AI
When the SaaS apps you’re using today - like Slack, and Atlassian Rovo - flip the switch and turn on new AI tools that can search, summarize, and act on all internal knowledge, there’s often a rush of excitement. Productivity promises. Smarter decisions. The chance to finally “unlock” that dusty corner of internal, corporate knowledge. Sometimes however, there's pitfalls and surprised enterprise leaders.
As many organizations are discovering, giving AI full access to your internal data isn’t a neutral act. Without preparation, AI can expose and amplify issues that have been quietly accumulating for years: poor governance, stale or incorrect information, shadow systems, and compliance blind spots. It’s a bit like throwing a high-powered searchlight into an attic you haven’t cleaned in a decade. You may find treasures… but you’ll also see trash, dust, and cobwebs.
Let’s explore the most common pitfalls organizations face when enabling AI for enterprise-wide knowledge access, real examples of where things have gone wrong, and a practical playbook to avoid these risks: especially around data governance, data age, and retention.
The Pitfalls No One Wants to Talk About
1. Weak or Outdated Data Governance
Data governance has always been a challenge, but AI changes the stakes. Poorly classified content, unclear ownership, and inconsistent permissions mean AI may surface documents you didn’t intend to share, sometimes with the wrong audience.
Example: In 2023, Samsung made headlines when engineers accidentally pasted proprietary semiconductor code into ChatGPT. The AI model wasn’t malicious. It simply ingested whatever it was given. But the incident exposed a lack of governance and access controls around sensitive data.
Without a clear governance framework, AI will faithfully reproduce all the flaws in your data security and information classification.
2. Data Sprawl and “Shadow AI”
Over years, data sprawls across systems: wikis, shared drives, chat threads, cloud storage. AI tools don’t care if the information is three clicks deep in a retired Confluence space or on a forgotten Google Drive folder, they’ll simply surface it. This is of course, a valuable part of the proposition. If the information is accurate, valid, relevant, and compliant. The problems arise when it isn’t all of those things.
Worse, employees may bypass official tools entirely, uploading sensitive content into unapproved AI systems (“Shadow AI”). The Cloud Security Alliance recently warned that this untracked use is one of IT’s fastest-growing headaches.
Without visibility and controls, you risk AI becoming the world’s most efficient gossip, repeating things that should have been archived or deleted long ago.
3. Hallucinations Meet Old, Bad Data
Generative AI is probabilistic—it sometimes fabricates plausible-sounding answers (“hallucinations”). Feed it outdated or conflicting internal data, and you’ve got a recipe for polished misinformation.
Example: In one financial services firm (name withheld for confidentiality), an internal AI assistant began surfacing outdated compliance rules from a policy PDF that had been superseded years earlier but never deleted. Teams unknowingly acted on this guidance, creating a compliance near-miss that required days of remediation.
4. Legal, Privacy, and Retention Risks
AI doesn’t just consume content, it also creates it. Prompts and generated outputs may be subject to the same retention, discovery, and legal hold requirements as traditional records.
In litigation, failing to produce relevant AI-generated content can be as damaging as losing an email archive. And if your retention policies are fuzzy, AI may also resurface private or regulated data that should have been purged under GDPR, HIPAA, or other frameworks.
5. AI Sprawl Across Departments
When every department experiments with its own AI tooling, you get AI sprawl: overlapping capabilities, inconsistent governance, and incompatible outputs. Instead of a single “source of truth,” you now have multiple AI-flavored versions of it.
The result? Redundant spend, fractured trust, slowed decisions, and increased risk exposure.
Why Data Age and Relevance Matter More Than Ever
Data governance isn’t just about security, it’s also about freshness. AI treats all accessible information as potentially relevant, but a five-year-old project plan may be more harmful than helpful if found in the context window and surface as part of a new answer today.
Stale knowledge can:
- Mislead and -paradoxically - slow decision-makers
- Undermine trust in AI tools (“This thing is wrong some of the time”)
- Create compliance exposure when outdated regulatory advice is followed
Think of AI as a L3/L4 employee: they’re quite capable but they still don’t have those years of experience to help discern the good from the bad when it comes to accuracy or compliance. AI struggles to understand what is and isn’t relevant, that’s something only a human can currently do really well.
In short: if you wouldn’t trust a well-trained human analyst to rely on it, it likely shouldn’t be in your AI’s knowledge set. So, what do do about it then?
The Playbook: How to Avoid These Pitfalls
So, here’s our ideas on how modern enterprises can prepare before giving AI the keys to the kingdom.
1. Establish AI-Aware Data Governance
- Define clear ownership for every major content repository: someone responsible for accuracy, access, and data lifecycle (including retention and deletion).
- Automate classification using metadata and AI-driven tagging so sensitive or regulated data is clearly labeled.
- Apply “least privilege” access so AI can only read what it’s authorized to share.
2. Audit and Reduce Data Sprawl
- Run content inventories across all systems to identify duplicates, abandoned spaces, and orphaned data.
- Use data mapping tools to visualize where sensitive content lives and who can access it.
- Decommission or archive obsolete repositories.
- Routinely delete information that is found to be non-compliant and outside of the retention policy. Using the right tools - such as Content Retention Manager for Confluence and Jira - can help you automate and audit these policies and lifecycle events.
3. Implement Retention and Archiving Policies
- Retention rules should apply to both legacy content and AI-generated outputs (prompts, responses, summaries).
- Archiving keeps historical value without polluting active search results: AI tools like Atlassian Rovo can be scoped to ignore archived spaces (footnote 1).
- Use helpful tools (like Opus Guard’s Content Retention Manager) to automate review, archival, and defensible deletion.
4. Clean for Quality, Not Just Quantity
- Standardize terminology and data definitions across the organization.
- Remove content that’s incomplete, misleading, or superseded.
- For critical workflows, ensure AI queries hit curated, validated sources first.
5. Govern AI Deployment Centrally
- Stand up an AI governance council with representation from IT, legal, compliance, security, and key business units.
- Approve new AI deployments centrally to avoid AI sprawl.
- Provide sanctioned AI tools and discourage unsanctioned usage with clear guidelines.
6. Train Users and Set Expectations
- Teach employees that AI outputs are assistive, not authoritative.
- Encourage users to practice “trust but verify” behavior: especially so for decisions with compliance, legal, or customer impact.
- Make it easy for users to flag outdated or incorrect AI-surfaced information.
A Final Word: AI Magnifies Everything
AI doesn’t just accelerate productivity, it accelerates whatever’s already in your data, good or bad. Clean, governed, up-to-date information produces reliable AI insights. Messy, stale, or unclassified data produces unreliable (and potentially risky) results faster than ever.
Before enabling tools like Atlassian Rovo to traverse your internal knowledge, think less about the flashiness of the AI interface and more about the fitness of the knowledge it’s accessing. A few months of cleanup and governance work today can save years of headaches, legal costs, and reputational damage tomorrow.
Or, to put it more bluntly: don’t hand AI the megaphone until you’ve cleaned up what it’s going to amplify.
Ready to clean up for your AI strategy?
👉 Start your 30‑day free trial via Atlassian Marketplace now
👉 Need a walkthrough? Book a demo with our retention specialists
Footnotes
- Implication for Rovo’s Search Scope
While there’s no direct documentation for Rovo explicitly stating that it ignores archived spaces, Rovo’s search functionality is built on the content and permissions layer of Atlassian products, particularly Confluence. It respects the same search boundaries set by Confluence, as noted here:
Rovo Search “respects your permissions,” meaning you only see content you’re authorized to access—including adherence to Confluence’s archiving behavior. Atlassian Support